Although I think Leonard has a good shot at dismissing the roommate agreement, there are some who may not agree. Courts generally do not accept ignorance or non-reading as a plausible defence. It is generally considered that, without fraud, if you sign a contract that means that you have read it, understood it, and accepts all the inherent risks involved. Leonard is a highly educated and intelligent scientist who works for a renowned university. A judge can easily consider the agreement and, however ridiculous, maintain its validity. “Hey, you`re a smart guy and you signed it. Take care of that. It goes on like this, and so on. Look, I give them this: the roommate deal is funny and was a reliable source of comedy, but is it legally valid? The issue was actually raised in the show; In Season 4, Leonard Priya placed Koothrapali, a lawyer and sister of his friend Raj. When Leonard`s relationship with Priya came into conflict with Sheldon`s demands, Priya argued to Sheldon that the agreement was unenforceable. What for? Good news for Leonard, then… Courts tend to invalidate contracts in this unilateral way. From a legal point of view, we say that the content of the treaty is unacceptable.
In other words, the terms of the agreement are so unfair that they insult consciences. Apart from unfair terms, a contract is unacceptable though: the roommate agreement was written by Sheldon and was signed by Leonard when they became roommates for the first time. These events were reported during a flash-return. Sheldon begins to mention in the episode “The Cooper-Nowitzki Theorem” paragraphs of a friendship treatise. Subsequent episodes describe him as a roommate agreement, and Sheldon continues to quote him throughout the series, usually when one of the clauses is violated. But perhaps these clauses are insignificant without affecting the agreement in general, or perhaps the rest of the contract is in place because Sheldon had the foresight to include a separation clause. There are still ways to defeat the treaty. A roommate contract is not about the owner. It is a private agreement between the residents of the rental unit. This agreement writes commitments such as: ` The roommate contract can be shaken anyway, since Leonard and Penny are getting married for the start of the season, which means Leonard will probably move. To be on time, Greg. These other scenarios are not valid, but I think Leonard has a strong argument that the agreement is so unfavourable to him that it is a real burden.
Most clauses require Leonard to do something or not stop, and Sheldon doesn`t have much to do to meet all the requests of leonards. For those who do not watch, the main characters, Sheldon Cooper (Jim Parsons) and Leonard Hofstadter (played ungrateful by Johnny Galecki) are roommates and best friends. Before becoming a roommate, Sheldon forced Leonard to sign a contract in exchange for permission to rent Sheldon`s second bedroom. The deal is ridiculous after all. It contains many clauses that were designed only to get a laugh and have little or no real application. Here are some examples of clauses, according to the TBB wiki: A roommate contract writes the obligations and duties of each tenant in the rented apartment. It gives each roommate a clear understanding of their financial obligations each month, such as rent and incidental expenses, as well as their personal obligations as tenants, such as cleaning the bathroom or noise to a minimum. If there is ever a dispute between you and your roommate, this agreement will serve as proof that you have each agreed to assume certain responsibilities. On the one hand, the text of the agreement is clearly intended to use Sheldon at Leonard`s expense. While agreeing at regular intervals Leonard a bone (i.e.